<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO Newsletter, Excessive Link and Jason Calacanis Flakes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2007/08/seo-newsletter-excessive-link-and-jason-calacanis-flakes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2007/08/seo-newsletter-excessive-link-and-jason-calacanis-flakes/</link>
	<description>SEO and Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:43:49 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Semi  truck</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2007/08/seo-newsletter-excessive-link-and-jason-calacanis-flakes/comment-page-1/#comment-16687</link>
		<dc:creator>Semi  truck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 06:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceclay.com/blog-test/2007/08/seo-newsletter-excessive-link-and-jason-calacanis-flakes/#comment-16687</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Avoid excessive reciprocal links. What is excessive? Well, I suspect from experience that not having any reciprocal links doesn&#039;t seem to hurt a site at all, and having all reciprocal links probably isn&#039;t a good thing, especially in the more competitive areas. So the safe amount of reciprocal links is most likely somewhere in between. Also, this percent may change between search engines and may change for a given search engine over time. How many reciprocal links is safe is anybody&#039;s guess, but I think the safest thing is to not have any at all except those that happen by chance.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avoid excessive reciprocal links. What is excessive? Well, I suspect from experience that not having any reciprocal links doesn&#8217;t seem to hurt a site at all, and having all reciprocal links probably isn&#8217;t a good thing, especially in the more competitive areas. So the safe amount of reciprocal links is most likely somewhere in between. Also, this percent may change between search engines and may change for a given search engine over time. How many reciprocal links is safe is anybody&#8217;s guess, but I think the safest thing is to not have any at all except those that happen by chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Webb</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2007/08/seo-newsletter-excessive-link-and-jason-calacanis-flakes/comment-page-1/#comment-16686</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 01:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceclay.com/blog-test/2007/08/seo-newsletter-excessive-link-and-jason-calacanis-flakes/#comment-16686</guid>
		<description>...putting away the feathers... sigh...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;putting away the feathers&#8230; sigh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2007/08/seo-newsletter-excessive-link-and-jason-calacanis-flakes/comment-page-1/#comment-16685</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceclay.com/blog-test/2007/08/seo-newsletter-excessive-link-and-jason-calacanis-flakes/#comment-16685</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;have to go to nyc for family matters... thanks for being understanding.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>have to go to nyc for family matters&#8230; thanks for being understanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
