<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Permission Marketing is Still Best</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bruceclay.com/2007/11/permission-marketing-is-still-best/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2007/11/permission-marketing-is-still-best/</link>
	<description>SEO and Internet Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:23:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2007/11/permission-marketing-is-still-best/#comment-16983</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceclay.com/blog-test/2007/11/permission-marketing-is-still-best/#comment-16983</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Lisa, came across your post through a google alert about CommunityWalk. We do indeed have the links in there to support backlinks for Wedding Mapper. Our thinking was that people who enjoy CommunityWalk and want to support it can do so by linking to Wedding Mapper and if we provide them a way to remove the links if they want to then there&#039;s little harm in it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Still after reading your article and sleeping on it, I think we may have been a little too lenient on ourselves. I&#039;ve decided to remove the Wedding Mapper links. They should be gone by the start of next week.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best,
Jared
CommunityWalk Founder
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lisa, came across your post through a google alert about CommunityWalk. We do indeed have the links in there to support backlinks for Wedding Mapper. Our thinking was that people who enjoy CommunityWalk and want to support it can do so by linking to Wedding Mapper and if we provide them a way to remove the links if they want to then there&#8217;s little harm in it.</p>
<p>Still after reading your article and sleeping on it, I think we may have been a little too lenient on ourselves. I&#8217;ve decided to remove the Wedding Mapper links. They should be gone by the start of next week.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Jared<br />
CommunityWalk Founder</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

