<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 6 Reasons Why Your Awesome Site Isn&#8217;t Indexed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2008/02/6-reasons-why-your-awesome-site-isnt-indexed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2008/02/6-reasons-why-your-awesome-site-isnt-indexed/</link>
	<description>SEO and Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:43:49 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Susan Esparza</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2008/02/6-reasons-why-your-awesome-site-isnt-indexed/comment-page-1/#comment-17208</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Esparza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 14:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceclay.com/blog-test/2008/02/6-reasons-why-your-awesome-site-isnt-indexed/#comment-17208</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Michael,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sounds like you&#039;re mixing up the Meta Robots tag with the Robots.txt.  The Robots.txt resides in the root of your directory and directs search engines about what to do about various pages on your site before they ever request one from the server.  The Meta Robots tag lives in the Head section of each page and only pertains to the links and content on that page.  Here&#039;s a quick primer on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bruceclay.com/newsletter/0705/robots.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;how to use Robots.txt&lt;/a&gt;. If one isn&#039;t present, the search engine will receive a 404 error from the server when they request it, which is why we suggest putting one in the root directory even if it is blank.  Yes, the default behavior of the search engines is to be crawled, links followed and pages indexed.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>Sounds like you&#8217;re mixing up the Meta Robots tag with the Robots.txt.  The Robots.txt resides in the root of your directory and directs search engines about what to do about various pages on your site before they ever request one from the server.  The Meta Robots tag lives in the Head section of each page and only pertains to the links and content on that page.  Here&#8217;s a quick primer on <a href="http://www.bruceclay.com/newsletter/0705/robots.html" rel="nofollow">how to use Robots.txt</a>. If one isn&#8217;t present, the search engine will receive a 404 error from the server when they request it, which is why we suggest putting one in the root directory even if it is blank.  Yes, the default behavior of the search engines is to be crawled, links followed and pages indexed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mfleischner</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2008/02/6-reasons-why-your-awesome-site-isnt-indexed/comment-page-1/#comment-17207</link>
		<dc:creator>mfleischner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 10:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceclay.com/blog-test/2008/02/6-reasons-why-your-awesome-site-isnt-indexed/#comment-17207</guid>
		<description>Is it still necessary to use robots.txt on your pages for spiders to follow all of the content?  What happens if this tag is not presented?  Does Google assume that you site is to be crawled by default?
thanks,
Michael
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it still necessary to use robots.txt on your pages for spiders to follow all of the content?  What happens if this tag is not presented?  Does Google assume that you site is to be crawled by default?<br />
thanks,<br />
Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amelia</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2008/02/6-reasons-why-your-awesome-site-isnt-indexed/comment-page-1/#comment-17206</link>
		<dc:creator>amelia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceclay.com/blog-test/2008/02/6-reasons-why-your-awesome-site-isnt-indexed/#comment-17206</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;by reading this i have known some things about why search engines don&#039;t indexed some sites :)
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by reading this i have known some things about why search engines don&#8217;t indexed some sites <img src='http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2008/02/6-reasons-why-your-awesome-site-isnt-indexed/comment-page-1/#comment-17205</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceclay.com/blog-test/2008/02/6-reasons-why-your-awesome-site-isnt-indexed/#comment-17205</guid>
		<description>What about not appearing on MSN but ranking in top 10 for Google for a highly competitive keyword?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about not appearing on MSN but ranking in top 10 for Google for a highly competitive keyword?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dane</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2008/02/6-reasons-why-your-awesome-site-isnt-indexed/comment-page-1/#comment-17204</link>
		<dc:creator>Dane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceclay.com/blog-test/2008/02/6-reasons-why-your-awesome-site-isnt-indexed/#comment-17204</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;How can a site with any of the above attributes be considered awesome? I guess #1 might not degrade the awesomeness of a site but the rest certainly do.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can a site with any of the above attributes be considered awesome? I guess #1 might not degrade the awesomeness of a site but the rest certainly do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
