<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linking Q&amp;A</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bruceclay.com/2008/02/linking-qa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2008/02/linking-qa/</link>
	<description>SEO and Internet Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:11:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Cutts</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2008/02/linking-qa/#comment-17254</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Cutts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceclay.com/blog-test/2008/02/linking-qa/#comment-17254</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Martin, Google&#039;s ads are designed so that they don&#039;t flow PageRank and they don&#039;t affect search engines&#039; results. On the panel I mentioned a post by Google colleague Brian White: http://www.brianwhite.org/2008/01/12/link-selling-mistakes-including-the-buyers-directives/
In that post, Brian highlights a paid post where the person was so sloppy that they copy/pasted the advertiser instructions right into the middle of the post. That sort of post isn&#039;t helpful to users.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lisa, I can clarify this section more: &quot;People always do dumb things on their Web sites. The search engines don&#039;t need to crawl your Contact Us page. In any normal usage, you&#039;re not going to have to worry about it.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because search engines don&#039;t mind crawling peoples&#039; contact pages. :) We were talking about PageRank sculpting and how a) it wasn&#039;t the most important thing to work on, but b) it was similar to the fact that you decide what to link to on your front page partially based on what pages are important and should be surfaced to users/search engines. Rae asked whether you&#039;d ever be penalized for &quot;manipulating&quot; PageRank within your site.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My reply was that in general folks didn&#039;t need to worry about it. The fact is that people sometimes do control the flow of PageRank on their site to do irrelevant things (the example I gave was doorway pages). But that&#039;s quite rare, and a normal webmaster doesn&#039;t need to worry about the issue. And that the normal webmaster should also be more concerned with writing a great site that gets more links rather than tweaking exactly how the PageRank flows within their site.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin, Google&#8217;s ads are designed so that they don&#8217;t flow PageRank and they don&#8217;t affect search engines&#8217; results. On the panel I mentioned a post by Google colleague Brian White: <a href="http://www.brianwhite.org/2008/01/12/link-selling-mistakes-including-the-buyers-directives/" rel="nofollow">http://www.brianwhite.org/2008/01/12/link-selling-mistakes-including-the-buyers-directives/</a><br />
In that post, Brian highlights a paid post where the person was so sloppy that they copy/pasted the advertiser instructions right into the middle of the post. That sort of post isn&#8217;t helpful to users.</p>
<p>Lisa, I can clarify this section more: &#8220;People always do dumb things on their Web sites. The search engines don&#8217;t need to crawl your Contact Us page. In any normal usage, you&#8217;re not going to have to worry about it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Because search engines don&#8217;t mind crawling peoples&#8217; contact pages. <img src='http://blog.bruceclay.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  We were talking about PageRank sculpting and how a) it wasn&#8217;t the most important thing to work on, but b) it was similar to the fact that you decide what to link to on your front page partially based on what pages are important and should be surfaced to users/search engines. Rae asked whether you&#8217;d ever be penalized for &#8220;manipulating&#8221; PageRank within your site.</p>
<p>My reply was that in general folks didn&#8217;t need to worry about it. The fact is that people sometimes do control the flow of PageRank on their site to do irrelevant things (the example I gave was doorway pages). But that&#8217;s quite rare, and a normal webmaster doesn&#8217;t need to worry about the issue. And that the normal webmaster should also be more concerned with writing a great site that gets more links rather than tweaking exactly how the PageRank flows within their site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2008/02/linking-qa/#comment-17253</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceclay.com/blog-test/2008/02/linking-qa/#comment-17253</guid>
		<description>I love the quote from Matt...
&quot;here&#039;s some money, here&#039;s a link&quot;. Those links are not the most useful to searchers.
Lol, isn&#039;t that what Google&#039;s whole business model is based on... that&#039;s exactly what adwords are - now they&#039;re telling us those kind of things aren&#039;t useful to searchers, lol :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the quote from Matt&#8230;<br />
&quot;here&#8217;s some money, here&#8217;s a link&quot;. Those links are not the most useful to searchers.<br />
Lol, isn&#8217;t that what Google&#8217;s whole business model is based on&#8230; that&#8217;s exactly what adwords are &#8211; now they&#8217;re telling us those kind of things aren&#8217;t useful to searchers, lol <img src='http://blog.bruceclay.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shirley</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2008/02/linking-qa/#comment-17252</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceclay.com/blog-test/2008/02/linking-qa/#comment-17252</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the insight. I learned something today. Will consider doing that. But I don&#039;t know 301. What does it mean? Sorry still learning.
http://odchoi.wordpress.com
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the insight. I learned something today. Will consider doing that. But I don&#8217;t know 301. What does it mean? Sorry still learning.<br />
<a href="http://odchoi.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://odchoi.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

