<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Can Keep Its Site Search To Itself</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2008/03/google-can-keep-its-site-search-to-itself/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2008/03/google-can-keep-its-site-search-to-itself/</link>
	<description>SEO and Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:47:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rishil</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2008/03/google-can-keep-its-site-search-to-itself/comment-page-1/#comment-17348</link>
		<dc:creator>rishil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 02:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceclay.com/blog-test/2008/03/google-can-keep-its-site-search-to-itself/#comment-17348</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have been following the whole site search (which I fondly dubbed SiS)ever since I posted my critique of it on Ann Smarty&#039;s blog. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have had quite a few people email me along the lines &lt;i&gt;&quot;google helping you search your site is a good thing cause whatever search you have cant be better&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well as you rightly pointed out that this isnt the right attitude - most sites have custom built search engines performing a particular role that google isnt designed to do - convert a searcher in to a sale. I strongly contend that E-Comm sites would have searches that are specific, targetted and business focussed - by allowing the SiS box - there is a huge potential for an unsatisfied search experience. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No wonder Amazon has had theirs removed.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been following the whole site search (which I fondly dubbed SiS)ever since I posted my critique of it on Ann Smarty&#8217;s blog. </p>
<p>I have had quite a few people email me along the lines <i>&#8220;google helping you search your site is a good thing cause whatever search you have cant be better&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Well as you rightly pointed out that this isnt the right attitude &#8211; most sites have custom built search engines performing a particular role that google isnt designed to do &#8211; convert a searcher in to a sale. I strongly contend that E-Comm sites would have searches that are specific, targetted and business focussed &#8211; by allowing the SiS box &#8211; there is a huge potential for an unsatisfied search experience. </p>
<p>No wonder Amazon has had theirs removed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
