<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Essential KPIs for Search Engine Optimization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2008/05/essential-kpis-for-search-engine-optimization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2008/05/essential-kpis-for-search-engine-optimization/</link>
	<description>SEO and Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:43:49 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: handsome rob</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2008/05/essential-kpis-for-search-engine-optimization/comment-page-1/#comment-17490</link>
		<dc:creator>handsome rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceclay.com/blog-test/2008/05/essential-kpis-for-search-engine-optimization/#comment-17490</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;While I do understand the point being made about branded vs. non-branded search traffic, I have to say that a disproportionate amount of branded traffic should not be a KPI for anything beyond SEO. A high volume of branded searches generally indicates successful branding and/or PR efforts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google &quot;soda&quot; and see how many pages of results you have to click through before you find Coke. Google &quot;tissues&quot; and let me know when you find Kleenex.com. Google &quot;search engine&quot; and try to find google.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not arguing the value or validity of this KPI -- simply stating that its punch is limited to the microcosm of SEO. Take such a KPI out of that vacuum to its parent, Internet Marketing, and it loses something. Take it all the way up to plain-old Marketing, and... well you get the idea. It&#039;s building brands vs. building websites.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Personally I&#039;d rather own Coca Cola than be the webmaster of Soda.org.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I do understand the point being made about branded vs. non-branded search traffic, I have to say that a disproportionate amount of branded traffic should not be a KPI for anything beyond SEO. A high volume of branded searches generally indicates successful branding and/or PR efforts.</p>
<p>Google &#8220;soda&#8221; and see how many pages of results you have to click through before you find Coke. Google &#8220;tissues&#8221; and let me know when you find Kleenex.com. Google &#8220;search engine&#8221; and try to find google.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not arguing the value or validity of this KPI &#8212; simply stating that its punch is limited to the microcosm of SEO. Take such a KPI out of that vacuum to its parent, Internet Marketing, and it loses something. Take it all the way up to plain-old Marketing, and&#8230; well you get the idea. It&#8217;s building brands vs. building websites.</p>
<p>Personally I&#8217;d rather own Coca Cola than be the webmaster of Soda.org.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
