<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO Rehab &amp; Intervention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2008/08/seo-rehab-intervention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2008/08/seo-rehab-intervention/</link>
	<description>SEO and Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:45:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Hunkins</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2008/08/seo-rehab-intervention/comment-page-1/#comment-17888</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Hunkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 10:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceclay.com/blog-test/2008/08/seo-rehab-intervention/#comment-17888</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Lisa - this is a very good summary of a session that was very hard to follow.  My advice when you&#039;ve got these fine fellows in the room is to have them talk about case studies and experiments they have run that help us all better understand the opaque, fickle, and confusing Google ranking algorithm.   The next session had a lot more algorithmic meat.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Frankly, Google would be well advised to share more info about the algorithm in the interest of better online standards for all, though I&#039;m not holding my breath.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lisa &#8211; this is a very good summary of a session that was very hard to follow.  My advice when you&#8217;ve got these fine fellows in the room is to have them talk about case studies and experiments they have run that help us all better understand the opaque, fickle, and confusing Google ranking algorithm.   The next session had a lot more algorithmic meat.</p>
<p>Frankly, Google would be well advised to share more info about the algorithm in the interest of better online standards for all, though I&#8217;m not holding my breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Fitzgerald</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2008/08/seo-rehab-intervention/comment-page-1/#comment-17887</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Fitzgerald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 15:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceclay.com/blog-test/2008/08/seo-rehab-intervention/#comment-17887</guid>
		<description>I was in this session as well and felt that Ryan did a pretty lousy job of keeping the session on track and it was pretty much a disorganized free-for-all. Seems like you captured it pretty well!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was in this session as well and felt that Ryan did a pretty lousy job of keeping the session on track and it was pretty much a disorganized free-for-all. Seems like you captured it pretty well!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Krause Berg</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2008/08/seo-rehab-intervention/comment-page-1/#comment-17886</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Krause Berg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 06:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceclay.com/blog-test/2008/08/seo-rehab-intervention/#comment-17886</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Loved this!
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
