<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Report on Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bruceclay.com/2008/09/a-report-on-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2008/09/a-report-on-blogging/</link>
	<description>SEO and Internet Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:23:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2008/09/a-report-on-blogging/#comment-18047</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceclay.com/blog-test/2008/09/a-report-on-blogging/#comment-18047</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Fred,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorry if that was confusing; I should have been more clear. In last years State of the Blogosphere, David Sifry noted that there were 17 posts made per second or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sifry.com/alerts/archives/000493.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;1.5 million posts per day&lt;/a&gt; (scroll about 3/4 of the way down).  This year he mentions that the number dropped down to 900,000. So that&#039;s where those figures come from.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Fred,</p>
<p>Sorry if that was confusing; I should have been more clear. In last years State of the Blogosphere, David Sifry noted that there were 17 posts made per second or <a href="http://www.sifry.com/alerts/archives/000493.html" rel="nofollow">1.5 million posts per day</a> (scroll about 3/4 of the way down).  This year he mentions that the number dropped down to 900,000. So that&#8217;s where those figures come from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2008/09/a-report-on-blogging/#comment-18046</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceclay.com/blog-test/2008/09/a-report-on-blogging/#comment-18046</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the analysis, and the tip (I&#039;m now blogging on this same subject... ha ha!)
Where did you see the 1.5mil vs. 900,000 stat?  I only see one on the introduction that shows 1.5 mil as posts in the last 7 days vs. 900,000 posts in the last 24 hours.
What does tweeting about a blog post say about the medium?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the analysis, and the tip (I&#8217;m now blogging on this same subject&#8230; ha ha!)<br />
Where did you see the 1.5mil vs. 900,000 stat?  I only see one on the introduction that shows 1.5 mil as posts in the last 7 days vs. 900,000 posts in the last 24 hours.<br />
What does tweeting about a blog post say about the medium?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paisley</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2008/09/a-report-on-blogging/#comment-18045</link>
		<dc:creator>paisley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceclay.com/blog-test/2008/09/a-report-on-blogging/#comment-18045</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;being one of the people that has been &lt;a&gt;blogging since 1996...&lt;/a&gt; and having gotten 100k uniques a day a few times, (on various websites). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I wonder do the $$$ numbers include pron blogs..
i&#039;m not going to go into details because the interwebs never go away... but i can personally understand that would skew the numbers of traffic and $$$.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>being one of the people that has been <a>blogging since 1996&#8230;</a> and having gotten 100k uniques a day a few times, (on various websites). </p>
<p>I wonder do the $$$ numbers include pron blogs..<br />
i&#8217;m not going to go into details because the interwebs never go away&#8230; but i can personally understand that would skew the numbers of traffic and $$$.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

