<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The State of the Search Marketing Industry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bruceclay.com/2009/02/the-state-of-the-search-marketing-industry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2009/02/the-state-of-the-search-marketing-industry/</link>
	<description>SEO and Internet Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:23:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Dawson (Blue Snapper)</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2009/02/the-state-of-the-search-marketing-industry/#comment-18216</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Dawson (Blue Snapper)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceclay.com/blog-test/2009/02/the-state-of-the-search-marketing-industry/#comment-18216</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Susan. Thanks for the posting the summary info - it makes interesting reading. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A couple of comments:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Most UK PPC agencies I come across charge a % of ad spend which I think is illogical and an outdated model: why should a client pay more in agency mgmt fees just because they can spend more? The complexity/work involved in managing the campaigns hasn&#039;t changed. If the agency recommends increasing spend, is their advice truly for the benefit of the client? A flat fee is fairer in my opinion.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I fall into the group that thinks contextual ads are great but, as stated by Gordon, only if you treat them completely differently to search: visitors exposed to contextual ads have different needs and are in a different mind-set (early in the sales cycle) so require ads/offers to match. You also can&#039;t leave them open and free-running: cull sites that generate clicks/cost but convert badly. With some client campaigns I manage, I&#039;m hitting 30%+ conversion rates with this approach.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Andy
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Susan. Thanks for the posting the summary info &#8211; it makes interesting reading. </p>
<p>A couple of comments:</p>
<p>Most UK PPC agencies I come across charge a % of ad spend which I think is illogical and an outdated model: why should a client pay more in agency mgmt fees just because they can spend more? The complexity/work involved in managing the campaigns hasn&#8217;t changed. If the agency recommends increasing spend, is their advice truly for the benefit of the client? A flat fee is fairer in my opinion.</p>
<p>I fall into the group that thinks contextual ads are great but, as stated by Gordon, only if you treat them completely differently to search: visitors exposed to contextual ads have different needs and are in a different mind-set (early in the sales cycle) so require ads/offers to match. You also can&#8217;t leave them open and free-running: cull sites that generate clicks/cost but convert badly. With some client campaigns I manage, I&#8217;m hitting 30%+ conversion rates with this approach.</p>
<p>Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

