<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Bing Build a Brand?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2009/06/can-bing-build-a-brand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2009/06/can-bing-build-a-brand/</link>
	<description>SEO and Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:22:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kim Lautner</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2009/06/can-bing-build-a-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-24225</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Lautner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceclay.com/blog-test/2009/06/can-bing-build-a-brand/#comment-24225</guid>
		<description>I use both Bing and Google search     engine and i dont see much difference in their search results. I use google for searching hard to find academic topics and Bing for general search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use both Bing and Google search     engine and i dont see much difference in their search results. I use google for searching hard to find academic topics and Bing for general search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kymm</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2009/06/can-bing-build-a-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-23526</link>
		<dc:creator>Kymm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 03:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceclay.com/blog-test/2009/06/can-bing-build-a-brand/#comment-23526</guid>
		<description>i think that Bing is not as good as Google.     Google would still index new websites faster than Bing. Microsoft would still need a lot of catching to do with GoogleBot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think that Bing is not as good as Google.     Google would still index new websites faster than Bing. Microsoft would still need a lot of catching to do with GoogleBot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather May</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2009/06/can-bing-build-a-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-22412</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 08:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceclay.com/blog-test/2009/06/can-bing-build-a-brand/#comment-22412</guid>
		<description>my default search engine is Yahoo but now i am      using BING because it is much better than Yahoo. i heard that Bing search engine would power Yahoo search also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my default search engine is Yahoo but now i am      using BING because it is much better than Yahoo. i heard that Bing search engine would power Yahoo search also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2009/06/can-bing-build-a-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-21844</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 01:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceclay.com/blog-test/2009/06/can-bing-build-a-brand/#comment-21844</guid>
		<description>i am a user of Microsofts BING     search engine and it is as good as google search. for searching blogs, i think google gives more relevant search results compared bing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am a user of Microsofts BING     search engine and it is as good as google search. for searching blogs, i think google gives more relevant search results compared bing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
