<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nofollow Makes News at SMX Advanced</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bruceclay.com/2009/06/nofollow-makes-news-at-smx-advanced/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2009/06/nofollow-makes-news-at-smx-advanced/</link>
	<description>SEO and Internet Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:11:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2009/06/nofollow-makes-news-at-smx-advanced/#comment-18566</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 06:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceclay.com/blog-test/2009/06/nofollow-makes-news-at-smx-advanced/#comment-18566</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If Microsoft and Yahoo ignore the No Follow tag, as is supposed to be the case, then the reason most of my well-sculpted site rankings are identical in all 3 major search engines must be that Google have been sidelining PR sculpting for some while anyway.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just one point - if Google do start seriously ignoring their own tag then they&#039;ll need to introduce a new one so that we can internally strike out duplicate content sections like archives, otherwise we&#039;re back to square one on that issue having to use javascript redirects.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Microsoft and Yahoo ignore the No Follow tag, as is supposed to be the case, then the reason most of my well-sculpted site rankings are identical in all 3 major search engines must be that Google have been sidelining PR sculpting for some while anyway.</p>
<p>Just one point &#8211; if Google do start seriously ignoring their own tag then they&#8217;ll need to introduce a new one so that we can internally strike out duplicate content sections like archives, otherwise we&#8217;re back to square one on that issue having to use javascript redirects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virginia Nussey</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2009/06/nofollow-makes-news-at-smx-advanced/#comment-18565</link>
		<dc:creator>Virginia Nussey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceclay.com/blog-test/2009/06/nofollow-makes-news-at-smx-advanced/#comment-18565</guid>
		<description>Hi Ray, thanks for your comment. I hope I didn&#039;t confuse things too much. This post will be updated to better reflect the use we &lt;i&gt;do&lt;/i&gt; recommend for nofollow -- namely, as a minor, additional support for siloing. Bruce Clay, Inc. developed the technique of siloing before nofollow existed, so siloing will continue to be a strong strategy even if nofollow is not supported in the future. However, it is hard to say what effect a Google nofollow policy change will have because no official word has been released from Google itself. While the discussion currently occurring across the blogosphere is intriguing, it&#039;s all speculation until we hear from Google how they intend to treat the nofollow attribute.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ray, thanks for your comment. I hope I didn&#8217;t confuse things too much. This post will be updated to better reflect the use we <i>do</i> recommend for nofollow &#8212; namely, as a minor, additional support for siloing. Bruce Clay, Inc. developed the technique of siloing before nofollow existed, so siloing will continue to be a strong strategy even if nofollow is not supported in the future. However, it is hard to say what effect a Google nofollow policy change will have because no official word has been released from Google itself. While the discussion currently occurring across the blogosphere is intriguing, it&#8217;s all speculation until we hear from Google how they intend to treat the nofollow attribute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2009/06/nofollow-makes-news-at-smx-advanced/#comment-18564</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceclay.com/blog-test/2009/06/nofollow-makes-news-at-smx-advanced/#comment-18564</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Am I missing something here? Unless I&#039;m using frames and/or flash in my navigation to do my siloing, how does this not effect the Bruce Clay silo strategy? Doesn&#039;t Bruce say nofollow is an effective way to create your themes?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We are the middle of trying to theme and silo our site, and this seems like it would have a big effect on that effort.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I missing something here? Unless I&#8217;m using frames and/or flash in my navigation to do my siloing, how does this not effect the Bruce Clay silo strategy? Doesn&#8217;t Bruce say nofollow is an effective way to create your themes?</p>
<p>We are the middle of trying to theme and silo our site, and this seems like it would have a big effect on that effort.</p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

