Avinash Kaushik Keynote – Be Awesome: Ideas for Approaching Search Analytics Differently

Avinash Kaushik at SES

Have you ever heard Avinash Kaushik address an audience? It’s like watching a firework. Sparkling, irresistible and filled with the wisdom of the ancients. Well, I suppose Web analytics doesn’t go back quite as far as the pyrotechnics of 12th century China, but you know what I’m saying. I’ll try to bottle some of that magic now.

Mike Grehan introduces Avinash, @avinashkaushik, as a dynamic force of nature and our keynote speaker takes the stage. He says that he is the co-founder of Market Motive, which offers courses in online marketing. He also authors the blog Occam’s Razor, and wrote Web Analytics: An Hour a Day and Web Analytics 2.0 — books that teach about the evolving and changing world of analytics. He made $80,000 for each book and donated the money to charity.

So today he’ll be talking about how the Internet has evolved our fundamental belief about relationships. He’s going to tell four stories that highlight challenges we face.

Break Down Limits

He puts up a screenshot of an analytics report, which he calls a data puke. There are 20,000 keywords being tracked and how can you possibly manage that many keywords when you can only visualize about 20?

The solution is to filter with in-line segmentation. When you key in on the keywords you want to investigate, you apply a filter and that’s when you can break down. Reduce the massive glob of data to something very manageable.

Tag Clouds!

Wordle.net: They’re a fantastic way of visualizing tons of data. Go to Wordle.net and take 100s of 1000s of keywords and distill it on a one page image. If your keywords are evenly distributed, you can see it. You can see if your site is actually relevant to the keywords you’re interested in. If the business strategy is to do X and the reality is Y, are we really achieving what we want?

Juice Keyword Trees: You can see where a term connects with another term. Then by size you see how many people are coming in on that keyword and by color you can see how many people bounced away. You may find that in some cases you’re very diversified.

Outcomes, Baby! … Holistic Value

The common pain point around the world is I don’t have the resources I need. I don’t have a good CMS. But really, the problem is that they’re focusing on the wrong thing. Look beyond conversion rate. The average conversion rate in the U.S. is 2 percent. That’s not the whole story.

Avinash tried to convince his wife that he should blog, even though he could only do it late at night when the kids were asleep. She would tell him go to bed. So he tried to give her good reasons.

His point: I am kind of a big deal. Her response: Go to bed.

This piece of data didn’t convince her.

His point: I had more than 73,000 visits from 176 countries last year. Her response: Go to bed.

This piece of data is a stronger version of the one above, but it didn’t connect with his wife.

His point: In the last month I made $26,000 fake dollars (a number found by quantifying the value of assets, such as clicks to sign up for a presentation he’s making at a conference). Her response: Work harder.

That’s what you want. You want to talk to people in language and numbers that mean something to them. It’s really important to have goals. You don’t want to focus on the 2 percent of conversions. You want to know about the 98 percent of other activities going on.

You should be paying attention to micro-conversions, events that are creating economic value for your business. Take tripadvisor.com for instance. Yes, the big goal is to get a reservation. But when users click on ads, you get money. When people sign up for your newsletter, you can put a value on that. Offline conversions. User generated content. And on…

If you were tasked with measuring the success of tripadvisor.com, you would be missing out on so much if all you looked at was rooms booked.

Revenue = Good.

Economic value = God!

Think Looooooong Tail …Everything!

On his blog, about half of his traffic comes from search. This is pretty typical, but if you think about it, of those 40,000 visitors coming from search, they’re coming in from 26,000 keywords. He’s only focused on about 10 keywords, and 5,000 visitors come from them. Then the 26,000 keywords are brining in 35,000 visitors. So why obsess about a handful of brand keywords?

When you dig into the data you find your head is your brand terms. But people who come from the long-tail are reusing key phrases, typically connected to your category rather than your brand. The other fascinating thing about these long-tail users is that they’re not sure what they want. If you can get in front of them and convince them first, you get their business.

Avinash Kaushik Keynote

He was recently searching for cameras for a friend and he realized that Kodak was totally dropping the ball. He would search for the features they said were they’re big selling points. No Kodak. He would search for words directly from their site. No Kodak. He searched for a specific camera they make. There’s the camera, but not on Kodak’s site.

Kodak has taken the opportunity to find the right person at the right time, and squandered it. And it’s not just Kodak. Try it for Best Buy, Orbitz, Cisco, and Victoria’s Secret. It’s happening most of the time. These companies are thinking that of the consumer market. There’s a bunch of people that already know them. But you can’t stop and not try to grow your consumers.

Beyond “Fishing Experiments”

The Google AdWords Search-based Keyword Tool compares search queries and the robot indexed pages, or in other words, pages the Web has plus queries that are actually being searched. You can see what keywords are in your budget. You can look at actual queries. This is actual data.

Whether you show up or not, the traffic is going to go by. Like salmon traveling in the stream, be like a bear with your mouth wide open. The salmon will hop right in, as long as you’re there to catch them.

Intelligent Attribution

There are many different ways a conversion funnel can occur. What if before a conversion is made, the consumer sees ads, goes to an affiliate site, does searches, over a period of months. How can you attribute the sale? So do we freak out and cry? Not yet… Go back and consider “is this a problem for me, in my case?” Run the Visits to Purchase report (available in every platform). You might see that 80 percent of conversions happen within two visits. In that case, this isn’t a problem. Now if it looks like most of the conversions happen in 9 visits, then it’s an issue for you.

Analytics tools report what happens right before the click. Recognizing this, analytics platforms started giving the attribution to the first click. Next attempt was to give equal credit to every action. A bit more reasonably, they give most of the credit to the last click, and then spread the rest out among the other actions. There’s model today he calls “Make Crap Up.” A random set of rules distributes the attribution. It’s based on garbage and goes something like this:

Q: Why’d you give your e-mail 20 percent credit? A: Because my e-mail team is really big.

There’s also a decay model, where the actions farther back in time from the conversion gets less credit. This is the least worst model.

Last click gets 75 percent of credit.

Remaining 25 percent of credit:

  1. decaying function backwards for 3-5 clicks back
  2. all within last 7-30 days*


Impulse – back 7 days

More impulse to less considered – 7-14 days

… [missed a couple more nuances]

The point is that they can go back in history, that they put logic to their model. This is what you should strive for.

Is attribution going to go away? It’s not about crediting — it’s about the mix of media that’s the most productive for you.

Here are a couple ideas of what the future may look like.

  1. Media Mix Modeling: spend a test campaign in a number of key cities around the U.S. In each of the cities pick a platform, PPC, SEO, YouTube, etc. Then you’ll have the data to figure out the mix with the lowest CPA.
  2. Marginal Attribution: incremental conversions gives you marginal attribution

You can listen to him talk about these topics here: http://tr.im/mmsc4

The last message he’d leave us with is to always get the basics right. His son wanted a printer, so he searched for a wireless printer. The first ad landing page is a Flash site that takes a long time to load, and the end, doesn’t give him what he wanted. The second ad is just toner. The user isn’t getting what they want. That results in a whole lotta bounce rate. And remember, bounce rate = “I came, I puked, I left.”

Virginia Nussey is the director of content marketing at MobileMonkey. Prior to joining this startup in 2018, Virginia was the operations and content manager at Bruce Clay Inc., having joined the company in 2008 as a writer and blogger.

See Virginia's author page for links to connect on social media.

Comments (0)
Filed under: SEO — Tags: ,
Still on the hunt for actionable tips and insights? Each of these recent SEO posts is better than the last!
Bruce Clay on April 2, 2024
What Is SEO?
Bruce Clay on March 28, 2024
Google’s Explosive March Updates: What I Think
Bruce Clay on March 21, 2024
3 Types of E-commerce Product Reviews for SEO + Conversions


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Serving North America based in the Los Angeles Metropolitan Area
Bruce Clay, Inc. | PO Box 1338 | Moorpark CA, 93020
Voice: 1-805-517-1900 | Toll Free: 1-866-517-1900 | Fax: 1-805-517-1919